When I visited Germany, historical evidence of the Holocaust and contextually appropriate explanations of Germany's role in it were ubiquitous. Especially in Berlin. For some in Germany it's too much and they feel as if we should move on. (Especially those whose views overlap with WW II's villains.) But providing a fuller picture of any event serves everyone I think. Doesn't it? Those who were victims are acknowledged and can move forward instead of staying in a limbo of suffering. The ones who committed terrible acts are given a chance to own up to their role whether as individuals or cultures and presumably emerge the better for it. Idealistic as hell, sure. But shouldn't this be the least we strive for?
During the whole Confederate statue controversy the debate was between either keeping the statutes up like some sort of Stalinist tribute to an outdated ideology, or tearing them down and in the eyes of some (usually being disingenuous as hell) "erasing history". There are no monuments to the Nazis in Germany. But there are photos of them bordered by detailed accounts of what they did like living history textbooks. Context, I think, is one thing in short supply in the U.S. in general. It's what distorts history and simplifies the self-serving narratives repeated over and over again like hateful mantras.
That old cliche about those who don't learn history are doomed to repeat is still valid. But a certain part of America will never let themselves be seen as the bad guys. In this they are not alone. Other cultures try to bury the past and airbrush their misdeeds out of history. It never works. Instead, it crawls out from under the carpet in another form.
In Canada, our failings are massive and well documented. Especially regarding the people of the First Nations. How can a pamphlet make that go away? It can't of course but pretending something didn't happen is something sociopaths do.

.jpeg)

Comments
Post a Comment